Archive for November, 2024
Subscriptions
No ideology, no agenda, just a straight take on breaking economic data.
Each week as we scrutinize incoming data, we will send you a graph and a concise note on anything new that’s worth your time, 4 – 5 times a week. Our perspective allows you to make intelligent decisions no matter what political or economic outlook you embrace.
Subscribe for $27 a month > More Info... Subscribe > More Info... Subscribe >Archive
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- August 2024 (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- March 2024 (3)
- November 2023 (1)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (2)
- August 2023 (1)
- May 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (3)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (1)
- November 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (2)
- February 2022 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (2)
- May 2021 (5)
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (3)
- February 2021 (2)
- January 2021 (5)
- June 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (4)
- February 2020 (3)
- September 2019 (1)
- August 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (9)
- December 2018 (2)
- November 2018 (4)
- September 2018 (7)
- August 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (2)
- April 2018 (2)
- February 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (9)
- August 2017 (3)
- July 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (1)
- August 2016 (3)
- July 2016 (3)
- June 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (7)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (3)
- January 2016 (2)
- September 2015 (7)
- July 2015 (1)
- May 2015 (5)
- March 2015 (1)
- February 2015 (2)
- December 2013 (1)
- June 2013 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- May 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (2)
- March 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (1)
- September 2010 (1)
- August 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (1)
- August 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (2)
- January 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (1)
- November 2008 (1)
- October 2008 (1)
- September 2008 (1)
- August 2008 (1)
- July 2008 (5)
- June 2008 (9)
- May 2008 (1)
A Truly Who Knew Survey
Montana grizzly bears forage in the dusk
We came across a survey covering public support for the Endangered Species Act, including among different demographics, over roughly the last twenty years.
Jeremy Bruskotter and Ramiro Berardo, who teach at Ohio State, and John Bruskotter, at University of Michigan, compiled polls taken over the last twenty years and found support of the Act to be remarkably stable.
As background, visible declines in game species and those taken for millinery use, like the Carolina parakeet whose flocks once darkened the skies, led John Lacey, a Republican representative from Iowa, to introduce the Lacey Act of 1900, the first legislation regulating commercial animal markets. Later came the Migratory Bird Treaty of 1929, between the US and Canada, and others leading up to the broader Endangered Species Act of 1973.
Some animals protected by these acts have recovered, like our iconic bald eagle, bison, manatee and grizzly bear, while others, like the whooping crane, remain endangered with slowly recovering populations. That’s not so shocking: science-based conservation science is often effective and takes time.
What is shocking: the broader Endangered Species Act of 1973, written at Richard Nixon’s request, passed with a 355-4 vote. And the public likes it.
The authors compared results of the base survey conducted in 1996, and those conducted in 2011, 2014 and 2015 and found them “statistically indistinguishable.” Overall, four in five American support the Act, and one in ten oppose it, while some don’t know what they think. And, while gun control and climate change have become increasingly polarized, the majority of self-identified liberals, 90%, moderates, 77%, and conservatives, 74% support the Act. No surprise that 92% of environmentalists support the Act, as do 73% of hunters, who often partner with ecological conservation groups, but it is stunning that 71% of farmers and ranchers support protecting vulnerable species, as do 69% of property rights advocates, who have been among the most verbal opponents.
Another surprise: Some supporters of the Act have expressed concern that protecting “controversial” animals, like gray wolves, may turn people in wolf territory against the Act, but both trust in the Fish & Wildlife Service, which administers the Act, and opinions about wolves within and without wolf territory are equivalent.
If this all seems odd given the unflagging pressure in Congress to weaken the Act, other research, specifically this study of wolf reintroduction in Scotland, shows that leaders of special interest groups often hold more extreme views than their members.